Aharpo.252 net.news utcsrgv!utzoo!decvax!duke!chico!harpo!jerry Tue Jan 19 23:24:16 1982 Re: utah-cs.164: Truncated Articles (duke.1642 followup) An alternative to trying to confirm correct transmission on an item by item basis is a ocassional audit. Each system can from time to time tell the systems it is connected to which items it has and their checksums. There would then be a protocol by which a system could ask a neighbor to retransmit an item that had somehow been garbled. This mechanism is essentially the same as I have proposed to minimize the time machines spend talking to each other. But the objection usually raised to my proposal (i.e. you have to talk twice to get an item) doesn't apply if it is only used as a backup to the primary transmissions. Jerry Schwarz harpo!jerry ----------------------------------------------------------------- gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/ This Usenet Oldnews Archive article may be copied and distributed freely, provided: 1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles. 2. The following notice remains appended to each copy: The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.