Aucbvax.5648
fa.digest-p
utzoo!decvax!ucbvax!digest-people
Mon Dec 28 15:29:51 1981
Relative Addressing
>From ALA@MIT-AI Mon Dec 28 15:16:55 1981
The relative addressing issue for digests has to be considered in terms
of what it is used for. For digest lists which originate on the ARPAnet 
or are multi-network digests which use the ARPAnet to connect heterogeneous
or otherwise unconnected networks, ARPAnet relative addressing makes sense.
For a local digest which only goes across your own network, addressing
relative to your own network makes sense (indeed, ARPAnet relative addressing
is ridiculous and often impossible in that case--people may not have access
to ARPAnet crossing links but complete access to a local network). Software
which deals with digest style lists has to be smart enough to deal with
these two thoughts. This can be done either by the program asking the
user or maintaining a table of digests and appropriate address format.
Remember that only digestifying and undigestifying software has to
have this intelligence. Other software dealing with the lists do not.

	Best,
	Alyson

-----------------------------------------------------------------
 gopher://quux.org/ conversion by John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org>
 of http://communication.ucsd.edu/A-News/


This Usenet Oldnews Archive
article may be copied and distributed freely, provided:

1. There is no money collected for the text(s) of the articles.

2. The following notice remains appended to each copy:

The Usenet Oldnews Archive: Compilation Copyright (C) 1981, 1996 
 Bruce Jones, Henry Spencer, David Wiseman.