Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:28:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from hal3000.cx ([69.217.43.23] ident=root) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) id 1J6vmW-00064w-9c for gopher@complete.org; Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:28:22 -0600 Received: from work1.hal3000.cx (work1.hal3000.cx [10.0.0.2]) by hal3000.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA13590 for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:26:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris@hal3000.cx) Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:27:16 -0600 From: Chris <chris@hal3000.cx> To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: PocketPC / Smartphones Message-Id: <20071224162716.26d21965@work1.hal3000.cx> In-Reply-To: <47702A88.2040306@w00f.eu> References: <47702A88.2040306@w00f.eu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): AWL=0.096 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 16:28:22 -0600 X-archive-position: 1770 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: chris@hal3000.cx Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher I use it that way, there are several browsers that do, in addition pygopherd serves in gopher, html and wap at the same time, so regardless from one server you can view your content in many ways. Personally , I feel gopher is better than wap, but then developers of wap wouldnt have had anything to do ;) Happy Holidays! Chris On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 22:54:16 +0100 Mark <mark@w00f.eu> wrote: > Gopher would be an ideal candidate for today's small pocketPC's, > palmtops, smartphones etc, because it's mainly text-based and easy to > navigate. I am all for it... maybe this is a good way to promote > gopher's usefulness. It would be great to have a good gopher client.. > but i wonder if there is one! > > Mark > > > -- Join FSF as an Associate Member at: <URL:http://member.fsf.org/join?referrer=3014>