Message-ID: <472B7424.9030909@w00f.eu>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:01:56 +0100
From: Mark <mark@w00f.eu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071015)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gopher@complete.org
Subject: [gopher] Re: bucktooth 0.2.2
References: <200711021805.lA2I54Ji015446@floodgap.com>
In-Reply-To: <200711021805.lA2I54Ji015446@floodgap.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org

Well done. I have to admit though that some of your terminology is
pretty unknown to me, so is there any place I can read up on that?

Thanks :)
Mark

Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> After much delay, bucktooth 0.2.2 is now out. This update is strongly
> recommended for all Bucktooth users; although there are no serious security
> issues, there are some bugs and potential problems which are now repaired
> or mitigated:
>
> * Delay on hURLs lengthened to make their use by naughty people trying to
>   obfuscate malicious URLs unattractive. One day all clients will be smart
>   and the hURL-in-server kludge can die.
> * hURLs should really have a DOCTYPE in the generated HTML.
> * Embedded ? with arguments in hURLs now works.
> * Kludge to make unescaping %hex and + more intelligent and try not to do
>   it unless necessary.
>
> gopher://gopher.floodgap.com/1/buck
>
>