Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from c-24-1-211-91.hsd1.tx.comcast.net ([24.1.211.91] helo=turquoise.pongonova.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GDmQE-0006vC-Q1 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:52 -0500 Received: by turquoise.pongonova.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 96B98688; Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:02 -0500 From: brian@pongonova.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Active ? Message-ID: <20060817181602.GC15456@pongonova.net> References: <f705f7020608171000m1789a3c1r4f2c74e98375eaf2@mail.gmail.com> <20060817173342.76707.qmail@web35507.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060817173342.76707.qmail@web35507.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.0): AWL=-0.006, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, NO_REAL_NAME=0.178, RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL=1.655, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.137 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:16:52 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1349 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: brian@pongonova.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org> List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org> List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org> List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/> X-list: gopher > Note that different software handles transactions differently (one > may wait until it gets a response from a server before it allows > user interverntion, while another lets the user intervene at any > time). None of the staff at JumpJet work with Unix-like software > at this time, so we are currently unable to test this Client > ourselves. Perhaps someone else reading this thread could take up > the cause? So what is it, exactly, that JumpJet does that's gopher-related? --Brian