Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:28:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from web35504.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.163.179.128]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Fm2D1-00012S-FT for gopher@complete.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:28:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 40769 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Jun 2006 05:27:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3VVzwdrMDMVkenNZKXPWrBMxQ6cCULq8ohZSNVz2b5NYqVFnMaWaq/pG8PpYiZrO28BVScTVTNIGIBJEzsLc7zuc0rpX1taasRo433NsV+OM/NJyDoh2C2REHVqgTL7It3idqVmEZTdGscIL6yZbuS+z2SJqfn0WdmYfpqzNKBI= ; Message-ID: <20060602052754.40767.qmail@web35504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.216.94.5] by web35504.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 01 Jun 2006 22:27:54 PDT Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 22:27:54 -0700 (PDT) From: JumpJet Mailbox Subject: [gopher] Re: Trying to add a link to jumpjet site To: gopher@complete.org In-Reply-To: <1149194575.31224.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 2.5): AWL=-0.132, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.174, HTML_20_30=0.504, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:28:35 -0500 X-archive-position: 1305 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jumpjetinfo@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher For goodness sake everyone, please do NOT misconstrue my use of MSIE in a software example as some kind of an endorsement! My use of the MSIE software in the example was ONLY because most persons would probably be more familiar with this software than with some other more obscure example software I could have chosen. Besides, although it is always courteous to suggest to others software that we feel to be superior, what kind of software a person ultimately chooses is their own business (thats what the word "personal" in "personal computers" is all about). A person could access Gopher using Telnet for that matter, and if thats the way they want it, then more power to them. Dennis Schulmeister wrote: Hi everybody, to my mind Chris has a point. See, you even have to make changes to your registry in order to browse some gopher menus with Internet Explorer. How many users can we expect to do so? Let alone how many users still remember gopher if they know it at all? And those who remember, how many of them really use Internet Explorer (for browsing gopher space)? Greetings, Dennis Am Donnerstag, den 01.06.2006, 14:47 -0500 schrieb Chris: > I think I'd like to disgree and point out web browsers dont make the best gopher browsers as we know. There are many many gophers _not_ on port 70 and many reasons to do so. I dont feel we should make some "rule" such as this (which doesn't exist now) especially on behalf of M$ IE. Gopher protocol does not limit anyone to port 70 lets not try and change that. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.