Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:10:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from [69.217.43.23] (helo=hal3000.cx ident=root) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EorYs-00079k-Ev for gopher@complete.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:10:34 -0600 Received: from work1.hal3000.cx (work1.hal3000.cx [10.0.0.2]) by hal3000.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA01153 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:10:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris@hal3000.cx) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:07:26 -0600 From: Chris To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Whats all this talk about? Message-Id: <20051220180726.6afcb532@work1.hal3000.cx> In-Reply-To: <200512202341.PAA19356@floodgap.com> References: <20051220164435.76881a8a@work1.hal3000.cx> <200512202341.PAA19356@floodgap.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.1): FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:10:34 -0600 X-archive-position: 1179 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: chris@hal3000.cx Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher The box Veronica is on is a p200mmx Jughead is on another p200mmx Freebsd for both. The list of sites is included with the About_Veronica_Search text and About_Multi_Search talks of Jughead I am having problems with the .tree script in that there is not any decent fall backs for things like high latency or lost connection, there is an "Alarm" sent in text and that ends the "tree-ing" for that site. This may be why the results are so far differing at times with yours Cameron. I have shown which sites "Alarmed" and therefore are incomplete. For instance: gopher.semo.edu #alarm long way in that is to say after a long time and quite far in the tree I recieved an alarm which indcates one of several things, timeout, loss of connection, exceded "depth" etc. Durring my indexing I was experiencing the intitial network failures to my ISP via SBC lines as well I am afraid, so I will be working on a better database soon. Cameron I think you are indexing more than I atm as well, with my raw data being about 20M and the data file being 10M with a 1M offset file and a 5M "other" file . I will put Veronica up on the gopher tommorow or the next day so you can see how Barrie did this in perl if you dont have the software. I am running this nearly "right out of the box" Only had to fiddle with the file tree.local to allow off site indexing. I am working with Veronica-local which was, as I am seeing it, a local Veronica much like a Jughead would be. It's a very neat script imo and for my level it's teaching me as I work with it... Gotta run late for work! C On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:41:54 -0800 (PST) Cameron Kaiser wrote: > > Boy , it's nice to see someone besides my pagers noticed me gone :) > > SBC had a router barf and my ISP is on their lines. > > Nice to be back...51 hours off! > > Let me know how Veronica works for you. > > C > > Interesting. Some of the results are the same and some not. How did you > construct your index? > > The response time is very good, although to be fair to helsinki, it's only > a 500MHz G3. > > -- > --------------------------------- personal: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckaiser@floodgap.com > -- You told me to get a life. May I take yours? -- "Scream V" ----------------- > > > -- Join FSF as an Associate Member at: