Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:08:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.wplus.net ([195.131.104.155] helo=emaile.wplus.net) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EhNwL-0006gD-Cz for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:08:01 -0600 Received: by emaile.wplus.net with drweb-scanned (WebPlus antispam mailer ) id 1EhNwH-000FXl-00 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:07:45 +0300 Received: from [195.131.92.87] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by emaile.wplus.net with esmtp (WebPlus antispam mailer ) id 1EhNwD-000FWl-00 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:07:41 +0300 Received: (from rp@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA18367 for gopher@complete.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:06:58 +0300 Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:06:58 +0300 From: "R.A.Pavlov" To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Bot update Message-ID: <20051130090658.GB15038@freeshell.org> Mail-Followup-To: gopher@complete.org References: <20051031034851.GA30223@katherina.lan.complete.org> <20051129232006.GP19727@complete.org> <20051129210335.18b61281@work1.hal3000.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051129210335.18b61281@work1.hal3000.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-IP: 195.131.92.87 X-From: webmaster@ankylym.ru X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): AWL=0.018 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Wed, 30 Nov 2005 03:08:01 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1165 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: webmaster@ankylym.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 09:03:35PM -0600, Chris wrote: > Some other possibilities came to mind, things such as breaking it up into datasets and having various boxen here as well as at other gophers each maintain a dataset or sets. And this is close to the idea of WAIS searches where each server indexes its own content and other servers maintain lists of links to these WAIS servers. If you mean that each gopher server maintains a database of its own content. By the way I have some progress with WAIS and will show some results to the public very soon. > These were just some thoughts I had. Thanks John for getting it I think it's awesome and am excited to see what we can all do with it. > Chris > gopher://hal3000.cx > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 17:20:06 -0600 > John Goerzen wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:04:17PM -0600, Jeff wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:48:51 -0600, John Goerzen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Here's an update on the gopher bot: > > > > > > > > There is currently 28G of data archived representing 386,315 > > > > documents. 1.3 million documents remain to be visited, from > > > > approximately 20 very large Gopher servers. I believe, then, that the > > > > majority of gopher servers have been cached by this point. 3,987 > > > > different servers are presently represented in the archive. > > > > > > Any news? > > > > Not really. The bot hit a point where its algorithm for storing page > > information was getting to be too slow, and there was also a problem > > with the database layer I'm using segfaulting. When I get some time, I > > will write a new layer. > > > > In the meantime, I'd like to talk about how to get this data to others > > that might be willing to host it, as well as how to store it out there > > for the public. Any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Join FSF as an Associate Member at: > > -- Yours, etc. Roman A. Pavlov gopher://sdf.lonestar.org/1/users/rp