Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:55:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.21] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EbRgz-0000ge-Dv for gopher@complete.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:55:29 -0600 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.1]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jADNtFVN020819 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:55:15 GMT Received: (from newmanbe@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.13.1/8.12.8/Submit) id jADNtEUx027376 for gopher@complete.org; Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:55:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:55:14 -0600 From: Benn Newman To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: ???????? Message-ID: <20051113235514.GA24410@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.4): AWL=0.140, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05, UPPERCASE_25_50=0.207 X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:55:29 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1154 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher spam-Status: Yes (score 6.0): AWL=-1.926, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK=3.037, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS=0.361, MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID=1.704, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=1.485, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.15, +URIBL_SBL=0.629 What's the point of the spam 'detector' if you don't use it? (Though I suppose the cut off is above 6.0.) :-p -- Benn Newman | newmanbe@sdf.lonestar.org | gopher://igneous-rock.homeunix.net Learn about the Gopher Project: http://gopher.quux.org/1/Software/Gopher