Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:20:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nakhbi.aaronjangel.us ([216.203.43.129]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (No TLS peer certificate) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dlcru-0004Sz-GM for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:20:33 -0500 Received: from nakhbi.aaronjangel.us (nakhbi.aaronjangel.us [127.0.0.1]) by nakhbi.aaronjangel.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5O1NOkh003777 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:23:24 -0400 Received: (from aja@localhost) by nakhbi.aaronjangel.us (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id j5O1NO1Y003749 for gopher@complete.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:23:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:23:24 -0400 From: "Aaron J. Angel" To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Camino beats Firefox to the punch Message-ID: <20050624012324.GB14279@nakhbi.aaronjangel.us> References: <200506210501.WAA11788@floodgap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506210501.WAA11788@floodgap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): none X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:20:33 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 1049 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: thatoneguy@aaronjangel.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 10:01:02PM -0700, Cameron Kaiser wrote: > Camino now properly has i itemtype in the most recent 0.9 alpha build, > which means Camino 0.9 stable will probably emerge before Firefox 1.1. > Mac users, download 0.9a1 from www.caminobrowser.org. Now as in "just now"? Firefox has had that for a while in the dev builds. I'm using it now. gopher://nakhbi.aaronjangel.us/G/tech/firefox.png I can't find the bug report where it was added (if indeed there was one), but it's been in Firefox for a while.