Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:51:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from nakhbi.aaronjangel.us ([216.203.43.129]) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (No TLS peer certificate) (Exim 4.50) id 1Dm0l9-0006ZV-SU for gopher@complete.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:51:10 -0500 Received: from qatan ([24.159.142.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by nakhbi.aaronjangel.us (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5P2s2GU026659 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:54:03 -0400 Message-Id: <200506250254.j5P2s2GU026659@nakhbi.aaronjangel.us> From: "Aaron J. Angel" To: Subject: [gopher] Re: Camino beats Firefox to the punch Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:50:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <42BB8C21.2050301@telerama.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 Thread-Index: AcV4drbnf7YClltmQLGgmtH5mf60rgAudRXg X-Spam-Status: No (score 0.0): none X-Virus-Scanned: by Exiscan on glockenspiel.complete.org at Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:51:10 -0500 X-archive-position: 1052 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: thatoneguy@aaronjangel.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Most likely because I was too lazy to refer to the spec and just tried whatever worked. (-: -----Original Message----- From: gopher-bounce@complete.org [mailto:gopher-bounce@complete.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Hoskinson Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:29 PM To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Camino beats Firefox to the punch Aaron J. Angel wrote: >gopher://nakhbi.aaronjangel.us/G/tech/firefox.png > > Out of curiosity, why does this have a "G" item type? Should't it be "I"? (I'm actually in the process of writing a Gopher client, and when I tried to go here it offered to save the file to disk rather than display it as an image because it didn't recognize it as an image type... just wondering if it should behave differently.) -- Jeff