Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:52:47 -0500 (CDT) Return-Path: X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D11F3E for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:52:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (glockenspiel [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 20328-07 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:52:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from dns2.EurNetCity.NET (dns2.EURNetCity.net [80.68.196.9]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35DD29B for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 02:52:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from brillante.route-add.net (postfix@brillante.route-add.net [80.68.194.26] (may be forged)) by dns2.EurNetCity.NET (8.11.6p2-20030924/8.11.6) with SMTP id i3E7Ipq14975 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:18:51 +0200 Received: from marana (marana [192.168.1.4]) by brillante.route-add.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FC21030 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:53:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Alessandro Selli To: Gopher mailing list Subject: [gopher] pygopherd on Debian stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-EurNetCity-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EurNetCity-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: dhatarattha@route-add.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at complete.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 912 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Hello, I'm considering installing pygopherd to replace UMN gopherd on a Debian stable server running on a SPARCStation5. However, this distribution comes with python version 2.1.3, while pygopherd needs version 2.3. In order to have pygopherd running I'd need to upgrade the server to the testing python package, plus a small number of other dependencies. I wished I didn't need to have mixed stable/unstable packages on the "frontline" server, so before I give up on the server's "purity" and upgrade python with the testing package I wanted to ask this: when pygopherd was developped, was python 2.3 used because some of it's features where needed in order to have a fully functional gopherd server, or was it just because that was the python version available on the developer's computer and maybe pygopherd can work on python2.1? Any idea? Should I just try that? Thanks, Sandro -- Bellum se ipsum alet La guerra nutre se stessa Livio, "Ab urbe condita", XXXIV,9