Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:41:18 -0600 (CST) Return-Path: X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E378A for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:41:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (glockenspiel [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 17942-09 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:41:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from dns2.eurnetcity.net (dns2.EURNetCity.net [80.68.196.9]) by glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64D31B for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 08:41:12 -0600 (CST) Received: from brillante.route-add.net (postfix@[80.68.194.26]) by dns2.eurnetcity.net (8.11.6p2-20030924/8.11.6) with SMTP id i2DEAxK04534 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:10:59 +0100 Received: from marana (marana [192.168.1.4]) by brillante.route-add.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B040E1030 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:40:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 15:42:27 +0100 (CET) From: Alessandro Selli To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Gopherd or pygopherd? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner-Relay: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-352.3, required 5, AWL, SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_PINE) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at complete.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-archive-position: 885 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: dhatarattha@route-add.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Hello, I'm just now getting interested in Gopher and I'm currently running a gopherd 3.0.3 server. Since it's running on a slow machine (Sparc5-85), would you recommend a C-compiled binary server like gopherd or do you think I will not notice a big difference in system load/ memory consumption running an interpreted server like pygopherd? The server is not serving a community and the Sparc5 is quite beefed up with ram (232MB). Are there other differences between those two that I should be aware of to choose the correct server for my site? Bye, Sandro -- Bellum se ipsum alet La guerra nutre se stessa Livio, "Ab urbe condita", XXXIV,9