Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher);
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:30 -0500 (CDT)
Return-Path: <killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl>
X-Original-To: gopher@complete.org
Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org
Received: by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix, from userid 108)
id 83C8D18320A5; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:29 -0500 (CDT)
X-Scanned-By: clamscan at complete.org
Received: from netlx014.civ.utwente.nl (netlx014.civ.utwente.nl [130.89.1.88])
by gesundheit.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9538183203C
for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 05:20:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from killspy (kabel218067.mobiel.utwente.nl [130.89.218.67])
by netlx014.civ.utwente.nl (8.11.4/HKD) with SMTP id h5UAI3i00216
for <gopher@complete.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:18:03 +0200
Message-ID: <004001c33ef0$e45c1920$43da5982@killspy>
From: "Ruliz Galaxor" <killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl>
To: <gopher@complete.org>
References: <200306290131.SAA30706@floodgap.com>
Subject: [gopher] Re: bot's running
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:18:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-archive-position: 777
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
X-original-sender: killspy@roelisch.tmfweb.nl
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@complete.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: Gopher <gopher.complete.org>
X-List-ID: Gopher <gopher.complete.org>
List-subscribe: <mailto:gopher-request@complete.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:jgoerzen@complete.org>
List-post: <mailto:gopher@complete.org>
List-archive: <http://www.complete.org/mailinglists/archives/>
X-list: gopher
Hiya,
Yes, I noticed... and I have a small question or actually favor to ask...
because I'm currently using the system in which the type of request should
also be present (e.g. 0/robots.txt).
so could the bot both check for robots.txt and 0/robots.txt? or is that a
problem?
Besides that I'm currently rewriting my server from the requests with type
declaration to requests without type declaration, so it's not really that
big deal, but heh, I'm just providing feedback :P
greets and keep on the great work,
Ruliz
gopher@roelisch.tmfweb.nl
gopher://kabel218067.mobiel.utwente.nl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cameron Kaiser" <spectre@floodgap.com>
To: <gopher@complete.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 3:31 AM
Subject: [gopher] bot's running
> In case you didn't notice ...
>
> It may appear as either helsinki.floodgap.com or
> netblock-66-159-214-138.dslextreme.com.