Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list gopher); Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:41:15 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from christoph.complete.org (unknown [168.215.193.254]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637EF3B816 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:41:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by christoph.complete.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774215A461 for ; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:41:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 08:41:17 -0500 Subject: [gopher] Re: gopher 3.0.4 imminent Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) From: John Goerzen To: gopher@complete.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <274E6084-3C08-11D6-BC1E-0003930BF072@complete.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) X-archive-position: 507 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: jgoerzen@complete.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-ID: Gopher X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher On Wednesday, March 20, 2002, at 08:11 AM, Robert Hahn wrote: > That's quite the list. Thanks for your contributions. Thanks! > Now, while I haven't pulled a copy of 3.0.4 from CVS yet, I've a > question: I don't know how you did the rewrite, but I'd be interested > to know if the steps you took rewriting the code resulted in > rendering irrevalent the note about compiling in OS X under UFS... No, they did not. However, I can still try to accomplish that. Unfortunately, MacOS X is a nasty case because it doesn't behave like a Unix "should". I'm still uncertain why there even is a problem at all, because even with that behavior, the difference between #include "regex.h" and #include should do it. However, if necessarily, I will rename it for a future version. -- John