Received: with LISTAR (v1.0.0; list gopher); Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:45:34 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: Delivered-To: gopher@complete.org Received: from waltz.SoftHome.net (unknown [66.54.152.30]) by pi.glockenspiel.complete.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 661EB3B81A for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 18347 invoked by uid 417); 15 Feb 2002 14:48:13 -0000 Message-ID: <20020215144813.18346.qmail@softhome.net> References: <1013356041.3299.4.camel@Pflipp> <3C6C3A0D.B0EB14E6@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <3C6C3A0D.B0EB14E6@sympatico.ca> From: StefanRieken@softhome.net To: gopher@complete.org Subject: [gopher] Re: Gnopher, Themes Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:48:13 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Sender: StefanRieken@softhome.net X-archive-position: 467 X-listar-version: Listar v1.0.0 Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org X-original-sender: StefanRieken@softhome.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: gopher@complete.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Listar version 1.0.0 X-List-ID: Gopher List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: gopher Ralph Furmaniak writes: > > After installing 52 rpms, Gnopher is working for me and is just groovy. Most > other people will not need to install so many things, but > 1) I am using RedHat not Debian (sigh) If I made any Debian assumptions in Gnopher, please tell me. (But I guess you are referring to the lack of apt-get and the like?) Anyway, I'm impressed that you're willing to go through so much pain to install my li'l hack! `:-] > Gnopher's going great, and I was even able to put together a theme for it. I'm glad to hear (from you, but also from other sources) that installation eventually worked out and that it's running, and all (whoa, do I sound like a professional or what? :-) > You can download it or see a screenshot at my gopher which is at > sugaku.homeunix.org > (available both through http:// and through gopher://). Currently not available through both, at least for me (connection refused). Which kindly reminds me that Gnopher currently doesn't handle unavailable severs correctly %) Acnyway, I'd love to see your stuff so I'd appreciate it if you could resolve this problem. BTW, be sure to make a statement on a) licencing in general and b) if this theme may be part of the Gnopher distro and web site. It's not like I hire lawyers or so, it's just that I don't ever want to do that in the first place :-) > I might as well also say that bucktooth can handle URLs, as was proposed by John Goerzen. I don't completely follow the idea, and I didn't follow the discussion either, sorry. Is this documented? And is it useful considering the fact that other servers don't (have to) do it as well? No need to re-start the whole thread, just give me the conclusions :-) Thanks, Stefan