Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:17:26 -0800
From: Paul Lindner <lindner@inuus.com>
To: gopher@complete.org
Cc: lindner@inuus.com
Subject: [gopher] Re: overriding portions of the http protocol?
Message-ID: <20011219141726.C21210@inuus.com>
References: <87adwfvk67.fsf@vger.pretzelnet.org> <87r8prm47v.fsf@complete.org>
 <20011219122346.B21210@inuus.com> <87itb299ig.fsf@complete.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <87itb299ig.fsf@complete.org>;
 from jgoerzen@complete.org on Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:37:27PM -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Errors-to: gopher-bounce@complete.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: gopher@complete.org


On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:37:27PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Paul Lindner <lindner@inuus.com> writes:
> 
> > It looks like it won't be too hard to use Apache as a generic protocol
> > engine.  We should be able to use much of the Apache code base to make
> > a very nice server.  For example we can eliminate all the logging and
> > much of the authentication code right off the bat..
> 
> Yes, that sounds very, very nice.

Apache 2.0, amen.

> > CVS password: 
> > cvs [login aborted]: recv() from server pi.complete.org: Connection reset by peer
> 
> I'll look into the logs...  This may have been you:
[....]
> Dec 19 15:25:28 pi cvs-pserver[8649]: refused connect from
> 209.0.105.71
> 
> You might have a bad reverse resolve for your host.  If you can't get
> it fixed, let me know and I'll add an exception to the wrapper rules.

Sadly I don't have control over my reverse zone...  One of these
days...  Could you add 209.0.105.70-73 to your tcp wrapper exceptions?
thanks.


-- 
Paul Lindner    lindner@inuus.com   ||||| | | | |  |  |  |   |   |

    mod_perl Developer's Cookbook   http://www.modperlcookbook.org
         Human Rights Declaration   http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/index.htm